Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, David P. Quigley wrote:

> On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 08:14 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > 
> > > > It wouldn't be much effort to rebase this patch against Linus's latest
> > > > tree. I am assuming that the static lsm patch is in there based on the
> > > > recent discussion on LKML?
> > > 
> > > Oh, sorry for the two emails.
> > > 
> > > Yeah it's in 2.6.24.  So a rebase will be necessary anyway. 
> > 
> > That code may still change -- Arjan's update, for example.
> > 
> 
> What do you think should be done with this patch set? We have already
> gone past the 2.6.24 merge window so it seems as if it will have to be
> put into 2.6.25. Should I wait until 2.6.24 is released and repost it
> then? Is it possible for them to get into 2.6.24 since its early in the
> rc cycle?

Not as far as I'm aware.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux