Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 08:14 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> 
> > > It wouldn't be much effort to rebase this patch against Linus's latest
> > > tree. I am assuming that the static lsm patch is in there based on the
> > > recent discussion on LKML?
> > 
> > Oh, sorry for the two emails.
> > 
> > Yeah it's in 2.6.24.  So a rebase will be necessary anyway. 
> 
> That code may still change -- Arjan's update, for example.
> 

What do you think should be done with this patch set? We have already
gone past the 2.6.24 merge window so it seems as if it will have to be
put into 2.6.25. Should I wait until 2.6.24 is released and repost it
then? Is it possible for them to get into 2.6.24 since its early in the
rc cycle?

Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux