On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:36:57AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 05:40:30PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > > That's going to be somewhat harder... The REQ_IDLE used to be > > REQ_NOIDLE. bio_iov_iter_get_pages() is a single commit, so that's easy > > enough. The poll bits are 3-4 patches, so not too bad either. > > I think we'll simply need a tree that has latest master merged into > the block tree as a base. I'd prefer not to pull and entire tree into the xfs for-next branch if I can avoid it. > The only other option would be to cherry-pick > bio_iov_iter_get_pages from the block tree into the XFS tree, and I'll > resend the series so that it doesn't require the other block changes, > those are fairly mechanical merges that could be carried in linux-next. I think this is probably a better way of proceeding. Can you resend the series and in the description indicate what commit I need to cherrypick from the the block tree? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
