On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:31:56 -0400
> Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Let's take the simple and obvious approach by decompressing the binary
> > into a kernel buffer and then copying it to user space. Those who are
> > looking for more performance on a MMU system are unlikely to choose this
> > executable format anyway.
>
> The flat loader takes a very casual attitude to overruns and corrupted
> binaries. It's after all MMUless so has no real security model. If you
> enable flat for an MMU system then IMHO those all need to be fixed
> including all the missing overflow checks on the maths on textlen and the
> like.
What about the following patch? This with existing user accessors and
allocation error checks should cover it all.
----- >8
commit cc1051c9c57202772568600e96b75229a2a7cf19
Author: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jul 18 11:28:57 2016 -0400
binfmt_flat: prevent kernel dammage from corrupted executable headers
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_flat.c b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
index 24deae4dcb..fa0054c1c3 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
@@ -498,6 +498,17 @@ static int load_flat_file(struct linux_binprm * bprm,
}
/*
+ * Make sure the header params are sane.
+ * 28 bits (256 MB) is way more than reasonable in this case.
+ * If some top bits are set we have probable binary corruption.
+ */
+ if ((text_len | data_len | bss_len | stack_len | full_data) >> 28) {
+ printk("BINFMT_FLAT: bad header\n");
+ ret = -ENOEXEC;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /*
* fix up the flags for the older format, there were all kinds
* of endian hacks, this only works for the simple cases
*/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
