On Wednesday 12 September 2007 06:42, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > I guess you would have to run that without my targeted slab reclaim > > > patchset? Otherwise the slab that are in the way could be reclaimed and > > > you could not produce your test case. > > > > I didn't realise you had patches to move pinned dentries, radix tree > > nodes, task structs, page tables etc. Did I miss them in your last > > patchset? > > You did not mention that in your earlier text. Actually, I am pretty sure actually everything I mentioned was explicitly things that your patches do not handle. This was not a coincidence. > If these are issues then we > certainly can work on that. Could you first provide us some real failure > conditions so that we know that these are real problems? I think I would have as good a shot as any to write a fragmentation exploit, yes. I think I've given you enough info to do the same, so I'd like to hear a reason why it is not a problem. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
