Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:

> > I guess you would have to run that without my targeted slab reclaim
> > patchset? Otherwise the slab that are in the way could be reclaimed and
> > you could not produce your test case.
> 
> I didn't realise you had patches to move pinned dentries, radix tree nodes,
> task structs, page tables etc. Did I miss them in your last patchset?

You did not mention that in your earlier text. If these are issues then we 
certainly can work on that. Could you first provide us some real failure 
conditions so that we know that these are real problems?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux