On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:13:46PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Jan Blunck wrote: > > > Introduce white-out support to tmpfs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 1 > > mm/shmem.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+) > > I see there's debate about whether this (and its fellows) give the > right semantic to whiteouts; and I've not begun to think about that. > > But as a patch to tmpfs for what you're trying to do, it looks just > about fine. I say "just about" because the reference counting looks > right, but I wouldn't dare say that it _is_ right without testing. > > And I'd probably want to add a minor adjustment, so that a mount with > nr_inodes=1000 could still support exactly 1000 inodes, despite your > allocating one for the whiteout (usually never used) at mount time. > But that can follow along later, no problem. Also, you might want to make sure whiteouts work with ramfs, which replaces tmpfs when tmpfs is disabled. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
