Re: [RFC 11/26] tmpfs white-out support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Jan Blunck wrote:

> Introduce white-out support to tmpfs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/shmem_fs.h |    1 
>  mm/shmem.c               |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)

I see there's debate about whether this (and its fellows) give the
right semantic to whiteouts; and I've not begun to think about that.

But as a patch to tmpfs for what you're trying to do, it looks just
about fine.  I say "just about" because the reference counting looks
right, but I wouldn't dare say that it _is_ right without testing.

And I'd probably want to add a minor adjustment, so that a mount with
nr_inodes=1000 could still support exactly 1000 inodes, despite your
allocating one for the whiteout (usually never used) at mount time.
But that can follow along later, no problem.

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux