On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 05:40:57PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > David Chinner wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:40:08PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > >>>- repair driven design, we know what it is (Val told us), but > >>> how does it apply to the things we are currently working on? > >>> should we do more of it? > >>I'm sure Chris and I could talk about the design elements in btrfs > >>that should aid repair if folks are interested in hearing about > >>them. We'd keep the hand-waving to a minimum :). > > > >And I'm sure I could provide a counterpoint by talking about > >the techniques we've used improving XFS repair speed and > >scalability without needing to change any on disk formats.... > > Sounds like that could be an interesting discussion. > > Especially when trying to answer questions like: > > "At what filesystem size will the mitigating fixes no > longer be enough?" > > and > > "When will people start using filesystems THAT big?" :) Keep in mind that the way to get the most out of this meeting is for the fs people to have topics of the form "we'd really like to do X, can we get some help from the VM"? Or vice versa from vm people. That said, we can talk about whatever interests the group on the day. And that could definitely include issues common to different filesystems. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
