On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:55:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:58:10 +0530 "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > N O T E: > > ------- > > 1) Only Patches 4/7 and 7/7 are NEW. Rest of them are _already_ part > > of ext4 patch queue git tree hosted by Ted. > > Why the heck are replacements for these things being sent out again when > they're already in -mm and they're already in Ted's queue (from which I > need to diligently drop them each time I remerge)? > > Are we all supposed to re-review the entire patchset (or at least #4 and > #7) again? As I mentioned in the note above, only patches #4 and #7 were new and thus these needed to be reviewed. Other patches are _not_ replacements of any of the patches which are already part of -mm and/or in Ted's patch queue. They were posted again as just "placeholders" so that the two new patches (#4 & #7) could be reviewed. Sorry for any confusion. > Please drop the non-ext4 patches from the ext4 tree and send incremental > patches against the (non-ext4) fallocate patches in -mm. Please let us know what you think of Mingming's suggestion of posting all the fallocate patches including the ext4 ones as incremental ones against the -mm. -- Regards, Amit Arora - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
