On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Jun 20, 2007 11:29 -0700, clameter@xxxxxxx wrote: > > If you apply this patch and then you can f.e. try this: > > > > mount -tramfs -o10 none /media > > > @@ -164,10 +165,15 @@ static int ramfs_fill_super(struct super > > + if (options && *options) > > + order = simple_strtoul(options, NULL, 10); > > This is probably a bad name for a mount option. What about "order=10"? > Otherwise you prevent any other option from being used in the future. I tried to make it as simple as possible. The patch is primarily useful as a debugging aid since it eliminates the lower layers from the game. I think ramfs should be left as is sine it is intended as a minimal implementation that should stay simpl. If we really want such an option for good then it may best be added to shmem or ramdisk drivers? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
