On Jun 20, 2007 11:29 -0700, clameter@xxxxxxx wrote: > If you apply this patch and then you can f.e. try this: > > mount -tramfs -o10 none /media > @@ -164,10 +165,15 @@ static int ramfs_fill_super(struct super > + if (options && *options) > + order = simple_strtoul(options, NULL, 10); This is probably a bad name for a mount option. What about "order=10"? Otherwise you prevent any other option from being used in the future. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
