On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:43:31PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > > Yup, I see that once you accept the notion that it is OK for a > > file to be misslabeled for a bit and that having a fixxerupperd > > is sufficient it all falls out. > > > > My point is that there is a segment of the security community > > that had not found this acceptable, even under the conditions > > outlined. If it meets your needs, I say run with it. > > If that segment feels that way, then I imagine AA would not meet their > requirements today due to file handles and other ways of passing around > open files, right? > > So, would SELinux today (without this AA-like daemon) fit the > requirements of this segment? > Yes - RHEL 5 is going through CC evaluations for LSPP, CAPP, and RBAC using the features of SELinux where appropriate. Karl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
