On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:43:31PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > Yup, I see that once you accept the notion that it is OK for a > file to be misslabeled for a bit and that having a fixxerupperd > is sufficient it all falls out. > > My point is that there is a segment of the security community > that had not found this acceptable, even under the conditions > outlined. If it meets your needs, I say run with it. If that segment feels that way, then I imagine AA would not meet their requirements today due to file handles and other ways of passing around open files, right? So, would SELinux today (without this AA-like daemon) fit the requirements of this segment? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
