On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:10:00PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Read it like this: we don't have a good idea how to support multiple > namespaces so far. Currently, we interpret all pathnames relative to the > namespace a process is in. Confined processes don't have the privilege to > create or manipulate namespaces, which makes this safe. We may find a better > future solution. You also don't have a solution for multiple chroot jails, since they often have the same fs mounted in many places on given box *and* since the pathnames from the confined processes' POVs have fsck-all to do with each other. It's really not kinder than multiple namespaces as far as your approach is concerned. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
