RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 May 2007, Neil Brown wrote:

On Thursday May 17, Jeff.Zheng@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

The only difference of any significance between the working
and non-working configurations is that in the non-working,
the component devices are larger than 2Gig, and hence have
sector offsets greater than 32 bits.

Do u mean 2T here?, but in both configuartion, the component devices are
larger than 2T (2.25T&5.5T).

Yes, I meant 2T, and yes, the components are always over 2T.

2T decimal or 2T binary?

So I'm
at a complete loss.  The raid0 code follows the same paths and does
the same things and uses 64bit arithmetic where needed.

So I have no idea how there could be a difference between these two
cases.

I'm at a loss...

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux