On Wednesday May 16, Jeff.Zheng@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Here is the information of the created raid0. Hope it is enough.
Thanks.
Everything looks fine here.
The only difference of any significance between the working and
non-working configurations is that in the non-working, the component
devices are larger than 2Gig, and hence have sector offsets greater
than 32 bits.
This does cause a slightly different code path in one place, but I
cannot see it making a difference. But maybe it does.
What architecture is this running on?
What C compiler are you using?
Can you try with this patch? It is the only thing that I can find
that could conceivably go wrong.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/raid0.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff .prev/drivers/md/raid0.c ./drivers/md/raid0.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/raid0.c 2007-05-17 10:33:30.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/raid0.c 2007-05-17 10:34:02.000000000 +1000
@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ static int raid0_make_request (request_q
while (block >= (zone->zone_offset + zone->size))
zone++;
+ BUG_ON(block < zone->zone_offset);
sect_in_chunk = bio->bi_sector & ((chunk_size<<1) -1);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
