RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday May 16, Jeff.Zheng@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Here is the information of the created raid0. Hope it is enough.

Thanks.
Everything looks fine here.

The only difference of any significance between the working and
non-working configurations is that in the non-working, the component
devices are larger than 2Gig, and hence have sector offsets greater
than 32 bits.

This does cause a slightly different code path in one place, but I
cannot see it making a difference.  But maybe it does.

What architecture is this running on?
What C compiler are you using?

Can you try with this patch?  It is the only thing that I can find
that could conceivably go wrong.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

### Diffstat output
 ./drivers/md/raid0.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff .prev/drivers/md/raid0.c ./drivers/md/raid0.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/raid0.c	2007-05-17 10:33:30.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/raid0.c	2007-05-17 10:34:02.000000000 +1000
@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ static int raid0_make_request (request_q
  
 	while (block >= (zone->zone_offset + zone->size)) 
 		zone++;
+	BUG_ON(block < zone->zone_offset);
     
 	sect_in_chunk = bio->bi_sector & ((chunk_size<<1) -1);
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux