On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Jan Blunck wrote: > > I don't know. I tried to contact him a few weeks ago but failed. > Guess, maybe he isn't reading the @thunk.org email anymore which was > reference in the e2fsprogs source I used. I do pay more attention to mail sent to the @mit.edu address, but I don't recall any reservation requests sent to my @thunk.org address (nope, don't see it; maybe it got caught in my spam filters? When did you send it, precisely?) > Ted, > from ext2_fs.h I learn that the value 0x0020 is left unused. > > #define EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010 > #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS 0x0040 > #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080 > > Is this intentionally? I think 0x0020 was used at one point, but I can't remember what it was used for. It's almost certainly not in wide use at this point, so it's probably safe to use it; OTOH it's not like we're running out of bits at this point. - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
