On 5/14/07, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 14, 2007 15:14 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_JOURNAL_DEV 0x0008 /* Journal device */ > #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010 > +#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_WHITEOUT 0x0020 Is this flag reserved with Ted? It isn't listed in the e2fsprogs repo.
I don't know. I tried to contact him a few weeks ago but failed. Guess, maybe he isn't reading the @thunk.org email anymore which was reference in the e2fsprogs source I used. Ted, from ext2_fs.h I learn that the value 0x0020 is left unused. #define EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010 #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS 0x0040 #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080 Is this intentionally? Cheers, Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
