Re: [RFC] TileFS - a proposal for scalable integrity checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Valerie Henson writes:

[...]

 > 
 > You're right about needing to read the equivalent data-structure - for
 > other reasons, each continuation inode will need an easily accessible
 > list of byte ranges covered by that inode. (Sounds like, hey,
 > extents!) The important part is that you don't have go walk all the

I see. I was under impression that idea was to use indirect blocks
themselves as that data-structure, e.g., block number 0 to mark holes,
block number 1 to mark "block not in this continuation", and all other
block numbers for real blocks.

 > indirect blocks or check your bitmap.
 > 
 > -VAL

Nikita.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux