Re: [RFC] TileFS - a proposal for scalable integrity checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:16:41PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> 
> I guess I miss something. If chunkfs maintains "at most one continuation
> per chunk" invariant, then continuation inode might end up with multiple
> byte ranges, and to check that they do not overlap one has to read
> indirect blocks (or some equivalent data-structure).

You're right about needing to read the equivalent data-structure - for
other reasons, each continuation inode will need an easily accessible
list of byte ranges covered by that inode. (Sounds like, hey,
extents!) The important part is that you don't have go walk all the
indirect blocks or check your bitmap.

-VAL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux