Re: [PATCH 1/17] locks: trivial removal of unnecessary parentheses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:30:04PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu,  5 Apr 2007 19:40:51 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - unquoted
> >
> > Remove some unnecessary parentheses.
> 
> Please don't do this.  It is unnecessary churn for zero gain.

The gain is certainly very close to zero, but still seems positive
(removing some visual clutter), and the churn doesn't seem likely to
cause problems as long as we're touching the same lines in later patches
anyway.  I've no intention of launching any broad assault against
unnecessary parentheses.

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux