Re: forced umount?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pekka J Enberg wrote:
We never want to _abort_ pending updates only pending reads. So, even with revoke(), we need to be careful which is why we do do_fsync() in generic_revoke_file() to make sure pending updates are flushed before we declare the inode revoked.

But, I haven't looked at forced unmount that much so there may be other issues I am not aware of.

For the purposes of this thread we _do_ want to abort pending updates to
force the system to give up on a broken block device rather than block a bunch of tasks in the D state forever.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux