Re: forced umount?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is this revoke system supported for the filesystem as a whole? I thought it was just to force specific files closed, not the whole filesystem. What if the filesystem itself has pending IO to say, update inodes or block bitmaps? Can these be aborted?

Pekka Enberg wrote:
FYI, the revoke implementation have since been changed to follow the
badfs-style approach of the forced unmount patches. However, there are
some problems with the forced unmount patches that are now fixed in
the revoke implementation:

 - You can't use munmap() to take down shared memory mappings because the
   application can accidentally remap something completely different
to that region.
 - The ->f_light bits slow down other fget_light() users and  there's
a race between
   fcheck_files() and set_f_light().
- The operation can live-lock if a malicious process keeps forking. The revoke
   implementation solves this by revoking in two passes: (1) take
down the descriptors
   and (2) take down the actual inodes.

                          Pekka

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux