phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hmm, the problem with this is it bloats bad_inode.o with lots of empty > functions that return -EIO. Even though we're not interested in the > parameters, GCC doesn't know this, and doesn't fold the functions into only > the couple of definitions that return different types. > After posting this, I saw the discussion on the LKML. I was only about 12 hours late, as usual... Phillip - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
