Re: [PATCH 21/35] Unionfs: Inode operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:04:27 -0500
Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:50:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > This
> > 
> > 	/*
> > 	 * Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur
> > 	 * adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor
> > 	 * incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
> > 	 */
> > 
> > is probably the most common, and is what I use when forced to descrog
> > comments.
> 
> This what I normally do by default, unless it's a one-line comment, in
> which case my preference is usually for this:
> 
> /* Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur */

yup.

> I'm not convinced we really do _need_ to standardize on comment styles
> (I can foresee thousands and thousands of trivial patches being
> submitted and we'd probably be better off encouraging people to spend
> time actually improving the documentation instead of reformatting it :-), 
> but if were going to standardize, that would be my vote.

Sure.  comment-relaying-out patches would not be particularly welcome ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux