On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:09:03PM +0100, Latchesar Ionkov wrote: > It could be wasteful, but it could (most likely) also be useful. Name > resolution is not that expensive on either side of the network. The > latency introduced by the single-name lookups is :) *is* latency the problem here? Last I heard, it was the intolerable load placed on the DLM by having clients bounce the read locks for each directory element all over the cluster. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
