Re: 64-bit inode number issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 12:32 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >  o turn it off by default in -mm and see what goes boom
> > 
> > Will we even see the conditions for the NFS client to go boom in the
> > environments -mm kernels are typically run? i.e. does someone have a
> > test case that reliably triggers problems?
> 
> I don't know about that, but we (Red Hat) have had customers logging the
> problem in our Bugzilla against NFS.
> 
> Coming up with a reliable test case is a little tricky, as it involves setting
> up a server to generate fileids > 0xffffffff, and manipulating inode numbers
> directly generally isn't allowed...  Maybe it can be done with a ramfs hack.


you can do a debug hack inside the kernel, where on 32 bit inode fs's
you copy the lower 32 bit into the higher 32 bit (and maybe invert the
bits or something); this can then be verified for all kinds of things
all over the place ;)

-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux