Re: fscache review comments, part 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 	Unfortunately there's a lot of broken userspace that can't deal
> 	with 64bit inode numbers, so you need to make the lod behaviour
> 	a mount option at least, probably even the default.  Given that
> 	we're going to run into problems like that it might make sense
> 	to make the option VFS-level instead of just in nfs.  (Note:
> 	XFS already has an option like that)

This really needs fixing quite urgently.  We've seen it break ld.so/libdl (and
other things, but dynamic loading is one of the major pains as it's not
entirely obvious).

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux