Re: fscache review comments, part 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 28, 2006  17:45 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 02-ino64-nfs.diff:
> 	Unfortunately there's a lot of broken userspace that can't deal
> 	with 64bit inode numbers, so you need to make the lod behaviour
> 	a mount option at least, probably even the default.  Given that
> 	we're going to run into problems like that it might make sense
> 	to make the option VFS-level instead of just in nfs.  (Note:
> 	XFS already has an option like that)

A general question - is there a known list of common applications that have
problems with 64-bit inodes?  It's been mentioned several times, but I'm
wondering if any effort is going toward fixing those apps so that 5 years
from now (or whenever) we CAN have 64-bit inodes.  If it relates to on-disk
formats like ustar, we can always work with something like star to ensure
that it is useful in the future.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux