On Fri, 22 September 2006 15:17:51 +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Well, AFS_FS is itself marked as being experimental, so I'm not sure that the > AFS_FSCACHE option needs to be also. Good point. The other typo should be fairly obvious, though. Jörn -- Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small, and n is usually small. Fancy algorithms have big constants. Until you know that n is frequently going to be big, don't get fancy. -- Rob Pike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
