Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At least I cannot see why the AFS patch differs from the NFS one in > those two details. Actually, what the patch itself changes doesn't differ significantly - the difference is in the patch context. > > bool "Provide AFS client caching support" > (EXPERIMENTAL) ? Well, AFS_FS is itself marked as being experimental, so I'm not sure that the AFS_FSCACHE option needs to be also. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
