Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > These patches make it possible to share NFS superblocks between related > > mounts, where "related" means on the same server and FSID. Inodes and > > dentries will be shared where the NFS filehandles are the same (for > > example if two NFS3 files come from the same export but from different > > mounts, such as is not uncommon with autofs on /home). > > It's not clear why these were sent. To try and elicit some feedback. > The first 25 patches are, as far as I can tell, already in Trond's tree. > Whether Trond has the correct versions of these is now anybody's guess... He hasn't told me of any changes, but that doesn't mean he hasn't made any, I suppose. > "[PATCH 26/30] NFS: Use local caching" appears to be the first patch which > isn't in Trond's tree, but it doesn't work due to significant changes in > nfs_clear_inode(). Hmmm... David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
