On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:22:23 +0400, Alex Tomas said: > what if proposed patch is safer than an average fix? > (given that it's just out of usage unless enabled) Those are the *dangerous* patches, because they usually contain bugs that weren't tripped over by the 6 people who enabled it while it was bouncing around in the -mm tree....
Attachment:
pgpfggRePNvxe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
