Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Snitzer wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I disagree completely...  it would be an obvious win:  people who want
> stability get that, people who want new features get that too.

And developers have a better outlet for their wacky developmental urges...

And no real-world near-term progress is made for production users with
modern requirements. What you're advocating breeds instability in the
near-term.

Constantly patching the main, "stable" Linux filesystem breeds instability today.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux