Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
From: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:40:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <ZDRhQGYfOsJjzbjx@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1681116739.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> <ZDRhQGYfOsJjzbjx@gmail.com>



On 4/10/23 15:19, Eric Biggers wrote:

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 06:16:21AM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:

Patchset should apply cleanly to fscrypt/for-next


It doesn't apply.  What is the base commit?


Apologies, I dropped the first patch. Resending.

References:
- [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
  - From: Sweet Tea Dorminy
- Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
  - From: Eric Biggers

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 11/11] fscrypt: split key alloc and preparation
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 06/16] ipe: add LSM hooks on execution and kernel read
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [linux Cryptography] [Asterisk App Development] [PJ SIP] [Gnu Gatekeeper] [IETF Sipping] [Info Cyrus] [ALSA User] [Fedora Linux Users] [Linux SCTP] [DCCP] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Deep Creek Hot Springs] [Yosemite Campsites] [ISDN Cause Codes]

Powered by Linux