Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:19:28 +0000
In-reply-to: <cover.1681116739.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
References: <cover.1681116739.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 06:16:21AM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> Patchset should apply cleanly to fscrypt/for-next

It doesn't apply.  What is the base commit?

- Eric

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
  - From: Sweet Tea Dorminy

References:
- [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
  - From: Sweet Tea Dorminy

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 05/16] ipe: add userspace interface
Next by Date: [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 02/10] fscrypt: split and rename setup_per_mode_enc_key()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [linux Cryptography] [Asterisk App Development] [PJ SIP] [Gnu Gatekeeper] [IETF Sipping] [Info Cyrus] [ALSA User] [Fedora Linux Users] [Linux SCTP] [DCCP] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Deep Creek Hot Springs] [Yosemite Campsites] [ISDN Cause Codes]

Powered by Linux