On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 21:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 4/1/24 8:47 PM, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 08:15:42PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > > From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I didn't remember I wrote this exact patch, but anyway the patch itself
> > is confusing.
My apology, the original patch was indeed rebased incorrectly onto
commit 782d8e61b5d6 ("fpga: dfl: kernel-doc corrections").
> >
> > >
> > > lkp reported 2 build warnings:
> > >
> > > drivers/fpga/dfl/dfl-fme-pr.c:175: warning: Function parameter or member 'feature' not described in 'dfl_fme_create_mgr'
> > >
> > > > > drivers/fpga/dfl/dfl-fme-pr.c:280: warning: expecting prototype for
> > > > > dfl_fme_destroy_bridge(). Prototype was for dfl_fme_destroy_bridges()
> > > > > instead
> > >
> > > Fixes: 29de76240e86 ("fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support")
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Colberg <peter.colberg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> All kernel-doc issues with this source file are already fixed in linux-next
> by this commit:
>
> commit 782d8e61b5d6
> Author: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu Jan 12 22:37:20 2023 -0800
>
> fpga: dfl: kernel-doc corrections
>
> Fix W=1 kernel-doc warnings in drivers/fpga/:
>
>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c
> > > index cdcf6dea4cc9..96cb24787ab1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c
> > > @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ static int fme_pr(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned long arg)
> > > * dfl_fme_create_mgr - create fpga mgr platform device as child device
> > > * @feature: sub feature info
> >
> > The member 'feature' is described here. It still causes build warning?
> >
> > > * @pdata: fme platform_device's pdata
> > > + * @feature: the dfl fme PR sub feature
> >
> > Why adding a duplicated item would fix the warning?
Apologies for the confusion; commit 782d8e61b5d6 only changed the
function name to plural, which addresses the kernel-doc warning;
whereas your original patch also changed the description to plural.
I will send a revised, correctly rebased patch.
Thanks,
Peter
> >
> > > *
> > > * Return: mgr platform device if successful, and error code otherwise.
> > > */
> > > @@ -273,7 +274,7 @@ static void dfl_fme_destroy_bridge(struct dfl_fme_bridge *fme_br)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > - * dfl_fme_destroy_bridges - destroy all fpga bridge platform device
> >
> > The prototype is for dfl_fme_destroy_bridges(), why the warning?
> >
> > > + * dfl_fme_destroy_bridges - destroy all fpga bridge platform devices
> >
> > Correct the plural form in description would fix the warning?
> >
> > > * @pdata: fme platform device's pdata
> > > */
> > > static void dfl_fme_destroy_bridges(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata)
> > > --
> > > 2.44.0
> > >
> > >
> >
>
