On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 08:15:42PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
I didn't remember I wrote this exact patch, but anyway the patch itself
is confusing.
>
> lkp reported 2 build warnings:
>
> drivers/fpga/dfl/dfl-fme-pr.c:175: warning: Function parameter or member 'feature' not described in 'dfl_fme_create_mgr'
>
> >> drivers/fpga/dfl/dfl-fme-pr.c:280: warning: expecting prototype for
> >> dfl_fme_destroy_bridge(). Prototype was for dfl_fme_destroy_bridges()
> >> instead
>
> Fixes: 29de76240e86 ("fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Colberg <peter.colberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c
> index cdcf6dea4cc9..96cb24787ab1 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ static int fme_pr(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned long arg)
> * dfl_fme_create_mgr - create fpga mgr platform device as child device
> * @feature: sub feature info
The member 'feature' is described here. It still causes build warning?
> * @pdata: fme platform_device's pdata
> + * @feature: the dfl fme PR sub feature
Why adding a duplicated item would fix the warning?
> *
> * Return: mgr platform device if successful, and error code otherwise.
> */
> @@ -273,7 +274,7 @@ static void dfl_fme_destroy_bridge(struct dfl_fme_bridge *fme_br)
> }
>
> /**
> - * dfl_fme_destroy_bridges - destroy all fpga bridge platform device
The prototype is for dfl_fme_destroy_bridges(), why the warning?
> + * dfl_fme_destroy_bridges - destroy all fpga bridge platform devices
Correct the plural form in description would fix the warning?
> * @pdata: fme platform device's pdata
> */
> static void dfl_fme_destroy_bridges(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata)
> --
> 2.44.0
>
>
