On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 06:18:37PM +0100, Marco Pagani wrote:
> The current implementation of the fpga bridge assumes that the low-level
> module registers a driver for the parent device and uses its owner pointer
> to take the module's refcount. This approach is problematic since it can
> lead to a null pointer dereference while attempting to get the bridge if
> the parent device does not have a driver.
>
> To address this problem, add a module owner pointer to the fpga_bridge
> struct and use it to take the module's refcount. Modify the function for
> registering a bridge to take an additional owner module parameter and
> rename it to avoid conflicts. Use the old function name for a helper macro
> that automatically sets the module that registers the bridge as the owner.
> This ensures compatibility with existing low-level control modules and
> reduces the chances of registering a bridge without setting the owner.
>
> Also, update the documentation to keep it consistent with the new interface
> for registering an fpga bridge.
>
> Other changes: opportunistically move put_device() from __fpga_bridge_get()
> to fpga_bridge_get() and of_fpga_bridge_get() to improve code clarity since
> the bridge device is taken in these functions.
>
> Fixes: 21aeda950c5f ("fpga: add fpga bridge framework")
> Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Russ Weight <russ.weight@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Applied to for-next.
