On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> +Cc: Nicolas
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:46:48PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:47:03PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > The semantics of the above is similar to gpiod_get_optional() and since NULL
> > > is a valid return in such cases, the PTP has to handle this transparently to
> > > the user. Otherwise it's badly designed API which has to be fixed.
> >
> > Does it now? Whatever.
> >
> > > TL;DR: If I'm mistaken, I would like to know why.
> >
> > git log. git blame.
> >
> > Get to know the tools of trade.
>
> So, the culprit seems the commit d1cbfd771ce8 ("ptp_clock: Allow for it
> to be optional") which did it half way.
>
> Now I would like to know why the good idea got bad implementation.
>
> Nicolas?
I'd be happy to help but as presented I simply don't know what you're
talking about. Please give me more context.
Nicolas
