+Cc: Nicolas
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:46:48PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:47:03PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The semantics of the above is similar to gpiod_get_optional() and since NULL
> > is a valid return in such cases, the PTP has to handle this transparently to
> > the user. Otherwise it's badly designed API which has to be fixed.
>
> Does it now? Whatever.
>
> > TL;DR: If I'm mistaken, I would like to know why.
>
> git log. git blame.
>
> Get to know the tools of trade.
So, the culprit seems the commit d1cbfd771ce8 ("ptp_clock: Allow for it
to be optional") which did it half way.
Now I would like to know why the good idea got bad implementation.
Nicolas?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
