On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 07:27:06PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 08:54:48AM -0800, matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Dec 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 08:18:03AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote: > > > > On 12/28/22 10:16 AM, matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: ... > > > > > + u64 params[]; > > > > u64 *params > > > > This will break the overflow.h macros, no? > > > Besides that it will break the code for sure as it's not an equivalent. > > > I don't understand how this will break the overflow.h macros. The definition > > of struct dfl_feature_info and all of its uses are in a single file, dfl.c. > > Hint: __must_be_array() > > As I said, the proposed change is not acceptable since it's not an equivalent. Ah, you meant that there is no use of macros from overflow in the dfl.c? IIRC we discussed that some of the code may make use of them, or am I mistaken? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
