Re: [PATCH 08/43] drm/fbdev: Add fbdev-shmem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Thomas,

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 9:19 AM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 12.03.24 um 17:14 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 4:48 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Add an fbdev emulation for SHMEM-based memory managers. The code is
> >> similar to fbdev-generic, but does not require an addition shadow
> >> buffer for mmap(). Fbdev-shmem operates directly on the buffer object's
> >> SHMEM pages. Fbdev's deferred-I/O mechanism updates the hardware state
> >> on write operations.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbdev_shmem.c
> >> +static int drm_fbdev_shmem_helper_fb_probe(struct drm_fb_helper *fb_helper,
> >> +                                          struct drm_fb_helper_surface_size *sizes)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct drm_client_dev *client = &fb_helper->client;
> >> +       struct drm_device *dev = fb_helper->dev;
> >> +       struct drm_client_buffer *buffer;
> >> +       struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> >> +       struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> >> +       struct fb_info *info;
> >> +       u32 format;
> >> +       struct iosys_map map;
> >> +       int ret;
> >> +
> >> +       drm_dbg_kms(dev, "surface width(%d), height(%d) and bpp(%d)\n",
> >> +                   sizes->surface_width, sizes->surface_height,
> >> +                   sizes->surface_bpp);
> >> +
> >> +       format = drm_mode_legacy_fb_format(sizes->surface_bpp, sizes->surface_depth);
> > Oops, one more caller of the imprecise
> > let's-guess-the-format-from-bpp-and-depth machinery to get rid of...
>
> Right, that has been discussed in another thread. I'll change this call
> to the drm_driver_() function.

You mean drm_driver_legacy_fb_format()? That has the same issues.

> >> +       buffer = drm_client_framebuffer_create(client, sizes->surface_width,
> >> +                                              sizes->surface_height, format);
> > [...]
> >
> >> +}
> >> +/**
> >> + * drm_fbdev_shmem_setup() - Setup fbdev emulation for GEM SHMEM helpers
> >> + * @dev: DRM device
> >> + * @preferred_bpp: Preferred bits per pixel for the device.
> >> + *                 32 is used if this is zero.
> >> + *
> >> + * This function sets up fbdev emulation for GEM DMA drivers that support
> >> + * dumb buffers with a virtual address and that can be mmap'ed.
> >> + * drm_fbdev_shmem_setup() shall be called after the DRM driver registered
> >> + * the new DRM device with drm_dev_register().
> >> + *
> >> + * Restore, hotplug events and teardown are all taken care of. Drivers that do
> >> + * suspend/resume need to call drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked() themselves.
> >> + * Simple drivers might use drm_mode_config_helper_suspend().
> >> + *
> >> + * This function is safe to call even when there are no connectors present.
> >> + * Setup will be retried on the next hotplug event.
> >> + *
> >> + * The fbdev is destroyed by drm_dev_unregister().
> >> + */
> >> +void drm_fbdev_shmem_setup(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int preferred_bpp)
> > As this is a completely new function, can we please get a
> > preferred_format parameter instead?
>
> An understandable question. But as it is, the patchset has a trivial
> change in each driver. And the preferred_bpp parameter has the same
> meaning as the bpp value in the video= parameter. So it's ok-ish for now.

OK.

> Using a format parameter here is really a much larger update and touches
> the internals of the fbdev emulation. I'm not even sure that we should
> have a parameter at all. Since in-kernel clients should behave like
> userspace clients, we could try to figure out the format from the
> driver's primary planes. That's a patchset of its own.

How do you figure out "the" format from the driver's primary plane?
Isn't that a list of formats (always including XR24) , so the driver
still needs to specify a preferred format?

A while ago, I had a look into replacing preferred_{depth,bpp} by
preferred_format, but I was held back by the inconsistencies in some
drivers (e.g. depth 24 vs. 32).  Perhaps an incremental approach
(use preferred_format if available, else fall back to legacy
preferred_{depth,bpp} handling) would be more suitable?

FTR, my main use-case is letting fbdev emulation distinguish between
DRM_FORMAT_Rx and DRM_FORMAT_Cx, which share the values of depth
and bpp.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds





[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Tourism]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux