On 2013/6/27 14:34, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 27/06/13 04:51, Yijing Wang wrote: >> On 2013/6/26 21:15, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >>> I couldn't find the rest of this series, and I'm not familiar with PCI. >>> So: is this patch and "aty128fb: use pdev->pm_cap instead of >>> pci_find_capability(..,PCI_CAP_ID_PM)" safe to apply for fbdev-3.11 >>> without anything else? I.e. has the PCI core changes been merged in 3.10 >>> or ealier? >> >> Hi Tomi, >> Thanks for your reply. Yes, it's safe, because PCI core has been use pdev->pm_cap to save >> the pm capability offset already. And PCI core changes related this pm init code has been merged >> long long ago(since year 2008). This series changes just to simplifier driver code about pm code. >> It's not necessary to access pci device register to get pm cap again, drivers can use pci device pm_cap >> member. and this series had no changes in PCI core. The rest of this series like for bnx2, bnx2x etc has >> been tested and accepted by other subsystems. > > Ok, thanks. I'll apply the two patches to my fbdev-3.11 branch. > > Tomi > > Thanks very much! -- Thanks! Yijing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
