On 27/06/13 04:51, Yijing Wang wrote: > On 2013/6/26 21:15, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> I couldn't find the rest of this series, and I'm not familiar with PCI. >> So: is this patch and "aty128fb: use pdev->pm_cap instead of >> pci_find_capability(..,PCI_CAP_ID_PM)" safe to apply for fbdev-3.11 >> without anything else? I.e. has the PCI core changes been merged in 3.10 >> or ealier? > > Hi Tomi, > Thanks for your reply. Yes, it's safe, because PCI core has been use pdev->pm_cap to save > the pm capability offset already. And PCI core changes related this pm init code has been merged > long long ago(since year 2008). This series changes just to simplifier driver code about pm code. > It's not necessary to access pci device register to get pm cap again, drivers can use pci device pm_cap > member. and this series had no changes in PCI core. The rest of this series like for bnx2, bnx2x etc has > been tested and accepted by other subsystems. Ok, thanks. I'll apply the two patches to my fbdev-3.11 branch. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
