On 04/30/2013 12:15 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Well, there is also at least one legitimate use case for this driver. > > I believe there exist embedded devices on which there is no need to > dynamically control the framebuffer. It needs one time initialization, > usually in bootloader, and then it is used as is, using constant > parameters as long as the system is running. > > I doubt there is a need for any KMS (or any other control) driver for such > devices - dumb framebuffer driver would be everything needed in such case. Isn't there usually the need to power off the hardware when blanking/suspending? Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
