On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 04:47:40PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:35:13PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > These patches fix a regression in 16-bpp support for older SOCs which use > > IBGR:555 rather than BGR:565 pixel layout. Use SOC-type to determine if the > > controller uses the intensity-bit and restore the old layout in that case. > > > > The last patch is a removal of uses of cpu_is_xxxx() macros in atmel_lcdfb with > > a platform-device-id table and static configurations. > > > > > > Patches from Johan Hovold taken from: > > "[PATCH 0/3] atmel_lcdfb: fix 16-bpp regression" > > and > > "[PATCH v2 0/3] ARM: at91/avr32/atmel_lcdfb: remove cpu_is macros" > > patch series to form a clean patch series with my signature. > > > > Arnd, Olof, > > as it seems that old fbdev drivers are not so much reviewed those days, can we > > take the decision to queue this material through arm-soc with other AT91 > > drivers updates? > > It would be beneficial to get an ack from Florian. Was he involved in the > review of the code that regressed 16-bpp support in the first place? When was > the regression introduced? Thought I'd send a reminder about these fixes. Has anyone picked them up for 3.9-rc? Thanks, Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
