On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:35:13PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > These patches fix a regression in 16-bpp support for older SOCs which use > IBGR:555 rather than BGR:565 pixel layout. Use SOC-type to determine if the > controller uses the intensity-bit and restore the old layout in that case. > > The last patch is a removal of uses of cpu_is_xxxx() macros in atmel_lcdfb with > a platform-device-id table and static configurations. > > > Patches from Johan Hovold taken from: > "[PATCH 0/3] atmel_lcdfb: fix 16-bpp regression" > and > "[PATCH v2 0/3] ARM: at91/avr32/atmel_lcdfb: remove cpu_is macros" > patch series to form a clean patch series with my signature. > > Arnd, Olof, > as it seems that old fbdev drivers are not so much reviewed those days, can we > take the decision to queue this material through arm-soc with other AT91 > drivers updates? It would be beneficial to get an ack from Florian. Was he involved in the review of the code that regressed 16-bpp support in the first place? When was the regression introduced? -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
