On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 04:58:10PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Wednesday 29 August 2012 15:07:49 Simon Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:35:46PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Monday 27 August 2012 17:54:52 Simon Horman wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:00:35PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > > > As part of a general panel API implementation (more on that a bit > > > > > later), I've cleaned up panel support in the LCDC driver and in the > > > > > related board code. The result is 19 patches independent of the > > > > > generic panel API that I would like to get reviewed by the respective > > > > > board maintainers. > > > > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > > > I'm happy for you to take all of this, including the mach-shmobile > > > > portions through your tree if that works for you. > > > > > > I usually push the LCDC patches through the fbdev tree. I'm fine with both > > > options though. > > > > I'm happy for you to handle things in your normal way. > > > > I guess that means that once the LCDC changes are in the fbdev tree > > Paul should take the linux-sh changes and I should take the shmobile > > changes, is that correct? > > To avoid bisection breakages all the patches should go through the same tree. > This will of course increase the chances of merge conflicts. Would you rather > take them all through linux-sh ? I'm happy for them to go through the fbdev tree. Feel free to ad my Ack. Paul has indicated a similar sentiment in another email in this thread. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
